من الاعتبارات الموجبة لتصحبح العقود الفاسدة

Abstract

 The jurists recognized the corrupt by their difference in explaining the rulings, some of them approved it as a description independent of the falsehood as it is according to the tap, and some of them approved it as an emergency description that is excluded from a general rule or application of the issues of evidence as it is with the public. Including those included in the assessment of the validity of judgments, some of which were imposed by necessity, and some that were based on the preponderance of reasonableness in the rulings, and some that were based on looking at the degrees of corruption. The goal of all this was to deal with its effects in a way that achieves the intentions of the two parties and removes the damage from them and does not contradict the purpose of the legislator.