الإِعْجَازُ القُرْآنِيُّ وَتَجَلِّيَّاتُ فِكْرِةِ الصَّرْفَةِ فِي الدِّرَاسَاتِ القُرْآنِيَّةِ

Abstract

As soon as the Qur'an came down on the Arabs, they acknowledged in the tongue of the situation or the article that it is a miraculous speech that does not resemble theirs, and a statement of paradox that does not resemble their statement, and the matter remained like this, until it appeared in the Islamic nation who claimed that the Qur'an is not incapacitated The importance of this study comes in the fact that it dealt with a controversial issue between the mu'tazila on the one hand, and the poets on the other hand, and perhaps the problem in this context, is how to receive Scientists have this idea? How could they respond to their owners and invalidate this call? Is the dispute in it considered or is its nullity a matter? What are the most important arguments in responding to them? The study reached a set of conclusions that can be summarized: that the idea of pure alien expats did not exist until the end of the second century AH, and that the scholars of the Qur'anic miracles expressed it in more than one sense, and that the most said by them are the mu'tazila, and most of those who responded to them were Al-Ashaira, and the majority of the arguments were in favor of Al-Ashaira and on the garjani.