المعارضة البرلمانية والبناء غير المكتمل بعد تعديل دستور2016
Main Article Content
Abstract
Parliamentary opposition and incomplete construction after the amendment Of the Constitution of 2016 Abstract The opposition has a clear indication in any political system of the existence of political parties or groups claiming to exercise their natural right within legal frameworks, struggling to gain power and to take power. They present themselves as an alternative to the rulers and market themselves as the best alternative. To address democratic systems we note that the opposition has the right to criticize and participate in the control of government work, in peaceful ways sound, do not go beyond the framework of directing accountability to the regime, and in some cases questioned. The nature of the constitution determines the type of opposition, because the constitutional factors reflect on the cases of political opposition and play an important role in directing political resources, political competition passes through the election process, otherwise the practice is mere behaviors that are closer to formality than to democracy, the opposition can not Is a means of change only within the framework of a democratic system that recognizes the legitimacy of the opposition and respects its rights, especially its right to govern if it receives a parliamentary majority In order to enhance its effectiveness, it is essential that the parliamentary majority should not be able to prevent the opposition from exercising its rights by using a simple majority. A balance must be struck between rights that do not restrict or impede the opposition from performing its functions effectively and those that are not broad enough to constitute A violation of the majority mandate.
ا
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.