منشأ اختلاف فقهاء المذهب عند الرّجراجيّ من خلال كتابه مناهج التّحصيل.

Abstract

According to ERRAJRAJI, the difference between the scholars of the Maliki doctrine is due to the difference in the concept of the Quran and the Sunnah and the contradiction of the origins, such as their differences in evidence, consensus, measurement, companion statement, approbation, interests, and consideration of disagreement. As well as, their differences in the specification of what is general, consensus, measurement, habit, and statement of companion. Moreover, the contradiction of evidence all of which was deliberately and representatively clarified by ERRAJRAJI, indicating that the origin of the disagreement in the Maliki doctrine is due to what was said before. One of the most important outcomes, the disagreement of the scholars in matters of fundamentalism and how to benefit from them influenced the process of devising jurisprudence, the opposition between the statements in the blog and its interpretation and explanation was the reason for their disagreement.