The Problem Of The Conversation On The Purposes Of The Law And Its Statement - Study In Examples From The Two Sahihs
Main Article Content
Abstract
As soon as the student of Sharia begins to investigate its parts and the jurisprudence of its scattered rulings, he will stand on a set of proven prophetic hadiths that may form in his mind according to what was decided by an arbitrator of the norms of the street in his desire, and perhaps this problem is strong in his heart when he stands on what has been quoted from some of the great jurists of the ummah Whoever responds to the hadiths produced in the most correct books after the book of God al-Bukhari and Muslim, which are at the highest level of correctness, were accepted by the majority of the predecessors and the backs, and when the consideration of the individuals of the reason for this response was reversed, it found an excuse that contradicts the objectives of the Sharia. I arrive for this strange lane on Al Awal Avenue. Then this paper came to discuss this complex problem, on the one hand, establishing some of what is controlled by this court from the arbitrators of capitals, and on the other hand, the study in its second part concerned an examination of what was related to some of the Sahihin’s hadiths regarding the problem of Maqasadi with a focus on criticizing the violator in regard to our topic, then concluded It lists four important findings and a recommendation
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.